I would say that designation in itself is not a problem, because sometimes designation can help in certain processes. What the problem is here is the effect of designation, of course, and the impact of designation into refugee rights that are acquired. So I would say that what we are trying to present as a possible area of improvement is that the impact of that designation should not infringe on acquired rights.
When someone is recognized as a refugee and has a right to family reunification and has a right to certain rights established in the 1951 convention, those rights should be available at the moment of recognition and should not be available later on because there is nothing in the convention that allows a country to give rights after a certain period of time.