That's a difficult question because it's an anecdotal situation. We've had two ships.
The question, to me, has to be framed in the context of individual cases. If we don't have any information about an individual, if our agencies and institutions that control our borders feel that there is a risk, they need to have measures in place to manage that risk. We cannot simply open the door and leave it wide open. We can't do that.
Now, all of that again is within the context of the provisions in law that ensure the rights of individuals. This is not indefinite incarceration, nor should it be. Regarding should we allow any one suspect of any of the three conditions I stated—terrorism, crime, or potential illness—to simply wander into the public at large, my personal view is no. I think that would be foolish.