I'll have to speak in English; my French is not up to it.
The answer is no; obviously, I've already stated my view.
One, we do want a fast, expeditious process, but it has to allow reasonable timeframes. It has to allow reasonable timeframes to prepare the initial statement form and it has to allow for reasonable timeframes for claimants to bring in corroboration.
The other alternative is this. The way the law is now, the jurisprudence says that if a claimant doesn't bring in corroborating documents, medical reports, proof of detention, proof that he attended demonstrations, the board member can draw an adverse inference. If you want to shorten the timeframes, then put into the legislation a provision that says a member cannot draw adverse inferences from lack of documentation. Then you've created a balanced system.
Right now the way it is, you're creating a situation where it would be impossible for claimants to bring in the documentation but still allowing members to draw adverse inferences from the lack of documentation. It's completely unfair.