I'll make a quick point. This is a question for Ms. Sims.
In listening to the explanation, the question I would have is, if you put it into a position in which the minister has to release the person because the refugee claimant no longer meets the requirements for detention purposes, then you're obligating the minister to release the person. Why would we allow the minister to make that decision as opposed to the local civil servant or border control staff? If there is no discretionary authority, and a refugee no longer is required to be kept in detention because of the legislation, why would it advance to the minister? I'm not quite clear on that point.