Yes. I think it is because there are these limits. The ICC's stated policy is to look at the highest level of perpetrators in any situation. If we have an alleged 2,000 war criminals in Canada, and they could be brought to justice elsewhere or one of the people who would be considered the highest-level perpetrator could go to the ICC, that makes sense.
If they are not, and if there isn't an option for justice elsewhere, that's where Canada can really make a contribution by bringing some of those cases.... For example, we've had one completed case, and there is another under way right now related to the 1994 Rwandan genocide. The Rwandan-Canadian community has been very involved in building those cases and very vocal about how important those cases have been.
If we could do more related to some of the other, many, situations of mass atrocities around the world, then we would really be contributing to the success of the ICC and the justice system as a whole.