Thank you. I will answer in English so that I can be a little clearer.
On the question about which situations we focus on for cases here in Canada, something that is very important is not just looking at justice in individual cases and negotiating for an extradition request but also investing in the justice processes that are happening in the affected countries. It's really interesting how the existence of the International Criminal Court is really spurring countries around the world to create this legislation to be able to try war crimes and crimes against humanity. Also, for example, as happened in Uganda, there were some cases before the International Criminal Court against the Lord's Resistance Army and others, and those spurred Uganda to really look at putting in place some effective war crimes legislation and to start to train judges and prosecutors to be able to use it.
Some Canadian officials, representatives of the Department of Justice and some other external experts, were involved in that training in Uganda, and some resources were made available for that. So I think we have to look at it holistically, look at building that capacity nationally. Then when specific cases come up, it's just very much on a case-by-case basis being able to know that our RCMP has enough resources to have some sense of the evidence and then there are discussions with national counterparts. We do this with our centre. We talk to our counterparts at the non-governmental level, the victims groups, and the NGOs in those countries about what they know about, what evidence they have, and we actually discuss and negotiate around what's the best justice option, and we have very few resources to do that. Certainly that could happen at the governmental level.
Then when there are no justice options elsewhere, we would look at the possibility of a case here in Canada.