This is also a matter of economics, which is something the committee will have to take into account as well. The more access to Canada becomes limited, the more Canadian tourism and the Canadian economy will be affected. It is a matter of balance between certain interests.
I think we should continue making evidence-based decisions. We must continue understanding the economic and sociological repercussions of the methods we want to promote so as to ensure that the costs are not actually greater than the benefits. We must also understand that the costs of measures that tend to slow down tourism or arrivals have real consequences in terms of security. That understanding must be ongoing.
I suggest that, for instance, every five years, an assessment of costs and benefits involved be carried out. An enduring responsibility makes something like that possible. It allows us to build knowledge on how the situation is developing.