Okay. I just want to get back to this particular case.
His presence in Canada since 1987 and his series of judicial appeals has cost Canadian taxpayers $3 million. When I learned of this—I'm looking at it—I actually asked if it was a typo. I couldn't believe it myself.
I'm very concerned when I hear witnesses state that we should be trying these particular criminals here in Canada and then allow them to go through judicial appeals. We're talking 1987, and it's now 2012. That's a long time. I'm sure that there isn't a single person watching this committee right now who would agree that this is actually the way to go. I'm very concerned about that.
Getting back to the actual screening policies, I'm wondering what recommendations you would make to correct the flaws in Canada's screening policies. I know you've talked about an independent regime to deal with complaints, but I'm not talking about complaints; I'm talking about how we can better screen people coming into Canada.