I'll answer the second question first. No, that would be an extreme outlier of a decision.
My answer to the first part would be a question for you, as to whether or not you believe in the presumption of innocence. If you do, you need to have a process to actually test whether an individual has engaged in these kinds of acts. If you don't, well then I'll leave that to you. But I personally do believe in the presumption of innocence and in the rule of law, and in a process that can fairly and efficiently ascertain whether or not someone is such a threat.
As I said throughout my comments—