No, I haven't, and I would be interested to see it. Depending on what definition of a serious criminal is being used, in my comments, I'm using the definition of a serious criminal in the proposed legislation and also the pre-existing one.
If we're talking about people who have been imprisoned or sentenced to custodial sentences of six months or even two years, that's where the figure of 850 becomes a huge issue. We can talk about crime in communities across this country and clearly demonstrate that it's a very small percentage of people who commit those crimes. But if we're talking about people who have received custodial sentences, even of six months' duration, in my experience as a front line police officer, that means these are people who are committing hundreds of offences.
The figure of 850 could actually mean a significant amount of offences, if we're talking about serious criminals. That's why I say, from a front line policing perspective, it's a big number. We can see in even large cities very small numbers of people engaged in chronic criminal activity who are victimizing Canadians over and over again, because they're committing crime after crime. When they go before a judge, charged with sometimes more than 100 break and enters, for example, there is a conviction on a few of them, some negotiation in terms of sentencing, and often it's not even a custodial sentence. It might be some term of probation or conditional sentencing, so that—