Well, yes and no. As we've said in our brief, and we really do invite you to read it, the problem with this is that with a lot of the other initiatives the minister has made, there were extensive consultations, so a lot of thought and discussion went into that. In this case, the backgrounder said—there was a campaign promise made—the minister asked his department to review and make recommendations. It almost sounds as though he got a wish list from within the department from some sectors saying what they would like to see. He's done that. I don't know where it came from, but I do know that we weren't involved in the process.
Sometimes mechanisms take some time to develop and to test and to toss around. That's what should be happening. I'd prefer to see that.
There are improvements. We've talked about a few very specific ones in there. You can't do conditional sentences and you shouldn't be barring people for merely committing or for foreign convictions without a right of appeal. Leave them with the right of appeal. If they're bad guys, expedite them. Get them through fast.