Mr. Lamoureux, beyond the unintentional misrepresentation, the big problem is the misrepresentation when a consultant does it without the knowledge of the applicant. There were a number of cases that were decided in the Federal Court recently where a misrepresentation was held, where a fake English language test result was put in by a consultant. Those people were found to have made a misrepresentation. Their applications were denied. Under the new legislation, that would generate a five-year bar. That's not fair.
The difference in some of these provisions is that here is where innocent people can be penalized. There is no right of appeal for these innocent people who are being penalized. If you take out this misrepresentation bar for the innocent and you put it onto people who have knowingly put in fake documents to try to jimmy their way into this country, those are the people you should be targeting. The law of misrepresentation, as Mr. Greene has indicated, is broad and it affects people who have—