Without wanting to pull the rug from under my colleague's feet, I would like to answer that question.
Here is the problem. If the act is amended so as to catch very dangerous criminals, as you claim, it will end up catching people such as those Mr. Goldman described.
That net is too big and too wide. We want to catch the very dangerous criminals, of course. Everyone supports that. We do not want dangerous criminals. I too am opposed to people who have committed war crimes coming here. But the net ends up being too wide.
The net is cast too widely, and it captures people and gives them no relief, people you did not intend to capture. I don't think you would intend that Salma not be granted some kind of relief. She didn't do anything. She is not a criminal. Why are we punishing her in the same way we're punishing someone who committed terrible crimes against humanity?
As you said, we have to have a way here in Canada whereby we apply the law and we are generous, to make a distinction and to have measures of relief that can help a person like Salma while not giving years to some criminal who committed grave crimes against humanity.