Thank you.
You brought up an interesting aspect of how something could go wrong and someone could be completely innocent. Yesterday's witnesses actually testified that in most cases a red flag would be for criminals, people who lied, fraudulently represented themselves on documentation, and so forth.
Your particular instance brings up a good question. I'm going to ask you that question, because I think it's important. In previous sessions it was portrayed that the computer system that does the electronic travel authorization would be the final say, and that's not the case in this particular piece of legislation. In fact, unlike in the United States where there is a lengthy appeal and a huge expense, it would actually be a visa officer who would review the entire file of a person that you just indicated. Were you aware of that?