No, we're saying the legislation would acknowledge the need to have both two years and five years for misrepresentation. It would be five years where it's clearly fraudulent. The regulations would determine what is unintentional.
November 26th, 2012 / 5:25 p.m.
Liberal
Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB
No, we're saying the legislation would acknowledge the need to have both two years and five years for misrepresentation. It would be five years where it's clearly fraudulent. The regulations would determine what is unintentional.
See context to find out what was said next.