I have a very quick question for Mr. Dykstra.
What would happen if the legislation that currently addresses it were to change at some point in the future? Would that not dictate that you would have to reintroduce a change to the current legislation in order to get the will?
Ultimately, if you're saying that, yes, you agree that the amendments that both the New Democrats and I are proposing are valid but not necessary because of other legislation, there's no way of knowing whether that legislation might change in the future. By allowing this amendment to proceed, what we're really doing is protecting the interests of what could be a very vulnerable individual.