Chair, to reinforce the point, at the end of the day, whether it's amendment 3 or amendment 4, the fact is the minister is accountable to Parliament. Not being able to defer to ministry officials, not being able to defer to a court, not being able to defer to the IRB, he or she will be responsible fully to Parliament, because, on an annual basis, a report is going to be submitted. In fact, it happens already. It will include all of the issues of both negative and positive discretion.
I actually understand Ms. Sims' point here. I do think it is relevant. It is actually going to be addressed in the annual report that the minister must submit. He will include within that report the decisions made with respect to both negative and positive discretion.
Perhaps we could have Ms. Clarke or Ms. Sadek comment on the annual report, and how both the negative and positive discretion decisions will, in fact, make up part of that report.