Yes, it's very helpful. It confirms, Chair, that the amendment isn't necessary. I think it has some intent, but I think the intent is already built into the system.
Misrepresentation in all of these cases must be significant and it must be consequential. If it's insignificant and it's not intentional, then there is the potential for them obviously to have it reviewed. There is also the intention of procedural fairness. If you're going to put in an amendment the suggestion that there is going to be inherent failure, then you have to be extremely concerned about any type of legislation that you bring forward. I do believe we have a system that currently addresses these issues and I think the penalty is a fair one. We've heard that it actually doesn't even come close to some other countries that we have looked to in terms of where they are with this legislation. I think we've built in everything we need into the current legislation.