Mr. Chair, I would like to go back to the previous amendment, when we talked about what misrepresentation was. It's intentional and it must be significant. Throwing in this whole unintended misrepresentation, I agree with my colleague, Mr. Dykstra, that it's pretty hard to determine if someone did not intend to misrepresent themselves to a degree that it's significant with the intent to mislead.
I agree that the clause is worded strangely, as though if someone accidentally does something incorrectly on the form, they're going to be penalized for two years regardless.
I think the officials of the department here indicated that if someone makes a mistake that is not significant or fraudulently done, there are methods of recourse to resolve that fairly quickly. I don't think that this particular amendment is really necessary. I agree with my colleague on this.