Mr. Chair, I think it's important to differentiate for the members of the committee between two different contexts.
The bill is dealing essentially with an administrative law concept of impacting on the person's citizenship if, as a member of an armed group or a member of armed forces of another state and they're a Canadian citizen, they engaged in acts of hostility against Canada.
In a criminal law context, or a military justice context, it's a different issue. If they committed specific acts such as treason, spying, assault, or murder, then yes, we would have jurisdiction to try them.
I think it's important conceptually to differentiate between criminal law and essentially an administrative law concept that this bill is discussing.
I hope that's of assistance.