Thank you, sir.
Mr. Shory, thank you for your presentation.
I see weaknesses and some ambiguities in the bill. I am just trying to understand. I would like clarification on some matters. I am still hesitating about supporting the bill because of those ambiguities.
I would like to quote your words. At second reading, you said this:
My bill would expand existing laws to see that those who commit acts of treason meet proper justice, with all due oversight and rights of appeal outlined in the Criminal Code and the Canadian Citizenship Act.
Are you proposing that acts of treason be synonymous with acts of war? At that point and in that regard, your bill lacks precision. I just want to understand. Do you feel that your bill would be better with a definition of an “act of war”? What is an act of war, in your view?