So it really is limited to a very specific context, one that does not at all fall within the meaning of this bill, in my opinion. We cannot frame it in that way. Thank you, that is clear.
You shed a little light on the issue for us in the sense that the term acts of treason could be applied in the case of someone in the army committing an act of terrorism against the Canadian Forces.
But can that same principle apply when an individual is not a member of the regular forces and is just an ordinary citizen? Can a military tribunal intervene in situations like that, in the case of actions committed by individuals who are not in the army?