Ms. James, unless members of the committee object, I'm going to ask the analysts something. We seem to have a certain amount of confusion about the terms “act of war”, “terrorism”, “armed conflict”, and there's another term being bandied around.
Would anyone object if I were to ask the analysts to prepare a paper on these topics for the committee to review the source of those terms? Are they defined legally? I'm sorry to go on like this. If you look at clause 2 of the bill, which talks about an act of war, someone's going to have to be convicted of committing an act of war for this clause to apply. Already we've had a suggestion that the term be changed.
Mr. Dykstra.