I'm not sure I would frame it as a non-issue. As I indicated earlier, though, the proposed amendments have gone through the legislative drafting process, and it's the government's position that they are constitutional.
I could say just a couple of other things. There's nothing in the charter that suggests that citizenship is inalienable. Our current law does actually allow for revocation of citizenship. International conventions like the European Convention on Nationality talk about instances where states can take away citizenship based upon conduct—