That goes back to the objective of the second part of the private member's bill, looking at circumstances where an individual who has Canadian citizenship and another citizenship has made a choice to violently demonstrate their disloyalty and has made a conscious choice to violently engage in some very serious and heinous actions, which could include terrorism, high treason, or enlisting in the army of a foreign state and engaging in armed conflict with Canada.
The objective of the second part of the bill relates to taking action against those who would attack our Canadian Armed Forces in some way, shape, or form and to the notion that the Canadian Armed Forces make a commitment to defending Canada and often give their lives to defend Canada and to defend Canadian citizenship. The idea is, why would people who would attack other citizens or our Canadian Armed Forces continue to benefit from Canadian citizenship?