The motion is carried. I will endeavour to try to get into the House to do that report today.
I have a couple of comments. Thursday, our next meeting, will be in either this room or the other room. It's for estimates with the minister.
I want to draw to the critics' and parliamentary secretary's attention that the amendments you've given to the clerk, together with any others—it's possible other amendments may be made—would have to be reintroduced, would have to be sent to the clerk. Depending on when this is dealt with in the House, we'll have to decide now or we'll have to have a subcommittee meeting to decide when those amendments should be filed. It's probably premature to do it now because we have no idea when the House will deal with this.
I'm thinking out loud. If we are authorized to expand the scope of the bill by the House, one raises the question, would there be further hearings, or do we jump into continued clause-by-clause? It's just an observation. If we're asking for this further expansion of the bill, it's conceivable that the government and members of the opposition could have further amendments. I don't know whether I'm right or wrong, but that's just something for you to think about. We would talk about that in a subcommittee meeting.
Does anyone have any comments?
Mr. Dykstra.