Yes, so basically it's those who have access to appeal under the new system and those who don't. To clarify, it was the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration alone who decided which countries would make that list; in other words, which refugee claimants deserved a second look at their cases, which ones deserved individual attention, versus which ones could be assumed to be, to quote an adjective he uses often, “bogus”.
In your experience with this department, you must see.... Maybe you don't want to go that far. You must have had some of the same concerns we've had, one of which is the concern around denying individuals from designated countries any right to an appeal. We feel that this is a denial of due process and a denial of justice to people who are potentially very vulnerable, and this government wants that cemented in legislation.
This could very conceivably, and I have little doubt will, result in sending someone back into a situation where they are being persecuted or worse. How can we afford this option to some and not to others?