You've actually bridged very nicely into my next question, and that is to get to the whole issue of the introduction of biometrics and the security level checks that we intend to enforce over the next number of years, including our partnership with the United States in that regard.
That is, the theme of this exercise of review is the security of Canadians in terms of the process that we are following in this respect. If we work through the theme of security as being a major principle behind why there is denial...because fraud would lead one to believe that a person is attempting to get into this country for some reason other than what they indicated on their forms.
I find it very difficult on a regular basis to have the individuals who are representatives here in the House of Commons indicate that there is anything other than the security of our country and Canadian citizens as the rationale behind why we pay such diligence to the reviews that are completed by our folks who work abroad in our ministry.
Could you comment?