So, all three of you. I just want to get on the record that all three of you just outright said that yes, the conditional PR should be abolished. Do any of you have anything you want to add?
Ms. Go, in the brief you sent in, you say that your organization believes that the proposals such as financial requirements to attack the issue of, of course, violence against women, “through the lens of immigration sponsorship while maybe well intended”—I'm reading from your brief actually—“is nevertheless wrong headed.” You also mentioned that it has a discriminatory impact. Could you go further into detail as to why?
Professor Straehle, if you want, please add to it as well.