I would agree. To Ms. Saperia's point earlier of giving some instruction to youth who might be subject to radicalization, I know I do that on my own with various groups. I've found a lot of success in trying to turn some of those kids to better endeavours.
Prior to 1976 Canadian citizenship could be revoked for high treason, but the Liberal government of the day chose that this shouldn't any longer be grounds for revoking citizenship even though almost every peer country would disagree, and many have since added grounds for that kind of revocation or renunciation.
So in addition it is legal to revoke citizenship for someone found to have obtained it fraudulently, and clearly there used to be and still are legal and constitutional grounds to revoke citizenship.
Would you agree this would still be the case with this bill and with the suggested amendments made?
Ms. Saperia, how about you?