Okay. That one, again I agree with you, or what I think is your view, that we should try to reduce the likelihood or incidents of citizenships of convenience, if we can do it in a fair way. That is perhaps the intent behind this, but it seems to me, by creating two classes of citizenship, by arguably going against the charter, this is not an appropriate way to achieve that end.
Do you have misgivings about this intent to reside on charter grounds or on grounds of creating two classes of citizenship, or on grounds that the minister wasn't even very clear what it meant? That is another issue.