No, I don't think that's unreasonable at all, and I don't know if anybody would think it is unreasonable to say that. Again I say that, with the team analogy, if you're a part of this team, we expect you not to kill your fellow citizens. We expect you not to lie your way onto the team. We expect you not to spy at our practice and then sell it to the other team. I won't say whether it's going to be the Senators versus the Leafs or not. Obviously, that depends on who is in the room.
In fairness to my other colleagues here, the issue and controversy with respect to dual citizenship is the charter issue. Someone who has applied for citizenship and doesn't have dual citizenship can't have it revoked due to the 1961 UN convention; wherein someone who has dual citizenship and breaches it can have it revoked and remain not stateless, obviously. That's an issue that we can't comment on in our organization. We're not a constitutional organization. The charter is not our area of expertise. I would turn that over to others to advise on the constitutionality of that.