Merci.
I have one proposed amendment that I think you have received. I'll just read it. It proposes adding a subsection 10.1(3.1):
Despite subsection (3), an instruction given by the Minister under this section takes effect on the 30th day after it is given.
The idea here is that, rather than having ministerial instructions go out with zero opportunity for the public or for experts to respond, there would be a 30-day period during which the minister could get advice. During those 30 days, the minister might choose to change or amend the instructions. I think that's consistent with what Richard Kurland said in evidence about the lack of due process. I think it's also consistent with a letter from the Canadian Bar Association, which said:
The CBA section has concerns about the limited consultation on this important change to Canadian immigration law and policy.
It goes on in that vein. I think one could even argue that it's in the interest of the government. If one puts out instructions that one later learns are imperfect, then it's embarrassing, but if one has a 30-day period of consultation to listen to alternative points of view, the end product might be better for all concerned.
That is my proposed amendment.