Thank you very much.
I know that you can only answer what your duties permit. I simply want to say that this committee did a study where witnesses were selected by various political parties and where the content was made public. Even though several witnesses recommended abolishing or seriously modifying the conditional permanent residence, it was not taken into account.
I'm wondering if the content of those meetings was selected to advance a political agenda or if it was considered as a whole. I know this isn't at all up to you to comment on this. Thank you for your answers.
I have a question about what's been done in other countries. I don't know which one of you will be able to answer.
Were practices in other countries, such as Denmark and the United Kingdom, studied when Bill S-7 was drafted?