I think it need not be amended. This is quite clear in the courts, and the law is clear in that respect. If the government wishes to be clear in their legislation and be focused in the legislation, as the Supreme Court says legislation should be, then it should be written into the legislation. I don't think I would object to a provision saying, “despite the foregoing, provocation shall not be raised or considered where a judge rules that the killing was motivated by honour, culture, or infidelity.” Something specific like that would not be offensive to me as a lawyer because that's already—
On April 30th, 2015. See this statement in context.