Okay, I think implicitly you have put forward a definition: if you're married to more than one person. But sometimes the definition is broader. I'm not sure if we're on a point of high principle opposed to this practice. We'd say it's okay if you pay us $400. That's another issue.
But I don't want to run out of time. I have one other issue, which is the defensive provocation, and I think perhaps that sends a bad message. I have two suggestions I'd like you to comment on. First is to remove the defensive provocation. I think that might be beyond the scope of the bill. Second, if you can't do that, then right now certain minor crimes like theft or mischief are included, but instead of that, have a list of more serious violent crimes that would fit the bill, rather than make it broad the way it is now.