Thank you, Ms. Siddiqui, for being with us.
I'd like to raise an issue that you, and also another one of our witnesses here today, raised, which is the use of immigration law in addition to criminal law. As I think you raised, that creates two problems at least. One is that immigration law has a much lower standard of proof and also double jeopardy, in that everybody's subject to the sanctions of criminal law, but only a subset is also subject to the sanctions of immigration law. Sometimes that subset can even include citizens, when certain kinds of citizens can have their citizenship removed and be deported and others cannot.
I know there's not much time, but I'd like to ask you, is this an issue for debate in the U.K.? To what extent does the immigration law replace or add to the criminal law? What's the state of debate on that issue?