The United States, the U.K., Australia, and New Zealand are all now using biometrics in their immigration screening in their border management programs. There are differences in how they do that given different contexts, different migration patterns. Some are islands, some have land borders, some have large international airports, and some have smaller international airports. There are differences in the details. New Zealand is taking prints from refugee applicants and certain other applicants and are only now, I think, moving to using biometrics to screen visa applicants. Australia is about where we are. The United States takes fingerprints from more people.
For example, in reference to the earlier question, they would fingerprint someone from the U.K. who is coming just temporarily to visit. That is not our plan. There are small differences among the countries but all of those countries are now using biometrics in one way or another to screen immigration applicants, either before they leave or on arrival. The United States, the U.K., and Australia are fingerprinting most of those 29 countries and one territory. It's a general statement, but we're talking about 30 different places. Our Five Country Conference partners, most of the time, would be fingerprinting most people coming from the 29 countries and one territory, yes.