Well, I don't think the appeal is the best vehicle, based on the experience other countries have had. Australia has been cited. It's a very long, expensive appeal. A lot of these applications are time sensitive. There should be some way of reviewing. I like the simple resubmission of the application, because that results in a fairly high number of approvals. I think 48% of the decisions are reversed. There perhaps could be other kinds of mechanisms, and Mr. Kurland alluded to them. There could be some kind of review network so that particularly MPs and visa officers don't have all their time ground up in handling these things.
This would require some resources. I don't have a full idea of what I'd like to see, but I think it would be worthwhile exploring this further in this committee.