My colleague noted there wasn't a definition for certain terms in this bill. Perhaps that makes this particular subamendment and the amendment overly broad. Would the government consider clarifying or defining some of those terms so it can be very clear, especially in applying throughout the public service, what those accommodation needs would be, as well as the scope of what sort of persons this would be applied to, again understanding the need to be compassionate and whatnot?
Sometimes we put forward amendments here without the correct legal context or definitions and then see difficulties in application within the public service. That would be my concern on the subamendment.