There's a correlation between matters that are being sent back by the Federal Court in which a member is specifically named, which is quite rare. The Federal Court, we've been informed, will only name particular members once they've seen a number of decisions in which the error is repeated.
There's a relationship between judges outing members and those same members having the lowest approval rate, so something is not right with these members. I certainly think that if the IRB investigated using the statistics on their own initiative, we could avoid many of the complaints and many of the issues that claimants—including, importantly, self-represented claimants—are facing.