Yes, “no credible basis” is a very legalistic determination, which I think, as Ms. Kwan discussed in a previous sitting, really limits a claimant's access to the federal courts, access to a stay, etc. Certainly there's no doubt, as Nas suggested, that the test for refugee protection is very legal also, so it ought not to matter to a very significant degree who an individual appears in front of. The same goes for no credible basis. I think variances in statistics are at least cause for concern.
