I would say yes. If there's a two-stage process whereby initially the panel investigates and finds that the conduct is so egregious that it should be referred to a disciplinary hearing, then yes, it should be made public. The public deserves to know who these adjudicators are and what they're doing.
In so doing, though, we obviously have to understand that these are refugee claimants, so any information that could identify refugee claimants would definitely need to be kept confidential.