To go back to the first point that you said he made, that it would destroy the morale of the board, a judicial council, JPs, they are all subject to this kind of an independent review. I can't speak to their morale, but they seem to continue as an institution without any problem. I don't necessarily see that as being a hurdle in having an independent body.
In terms of the cost and who would constitute that, I think it's certainly a concern, but I don't think it's a bar. I think it's something that maybe needs to be considered more.
Sorry, what was the last point?