My concern with that is that even the most well-intentioned person who is the head of an institution is going to want to preserve the reputation of that institution as well. Even though there hasn't been a huge number of complaints, part of that—just from my own experience and conversations with other practitioners—is linked to that it hasn't been seen as an open, transparent, or effective process. It's not because there weren't issues, but because we didn't really see it as something that led to any useful results.
On April 17th, 2018. See this statement in context.