Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you to the witnesses today as well.
I just wanted to check with you both and see how you feel about the conflict of interest process that we're doing.
There have been concerns raised about the fact that the complaints that are being dealt by the chairperson of the IRB might be seen as a conflict of interest because, first, they're a colleague and second, they're responsible for the reputation of the board. We've studied other quasi-judicial bodies, in regards to handling complaint systems, whereby it's better to...such as, against the justice of the peace, with a panel comprised of judges of other courts, chief justice, and lawyers that are put in place to do that review. Do you think that something similar for the IRB would remove the conflict of interest situation?