Well this is my absolute privilege, because I wasn't supposed to have any time to ask you questions and I wanted to. Thank you for still being here and giving me the opportunity.
Earlier in your testimony, you spoke around standards and how important it would be to have the standards or code of conduct, and then consequently to understand what the consequences or the repercussions might be in terms of not meeting those standards.
I wonder if you could expand a bit on that and give us some idea of whether or not the training process is impacted by lack of clarity around standards, and therefore you don't know what you're training to. How, in a quasi-judicial body, would we be able to incorporate those standards and the consequences into the training and appointment process, from your perspective?