Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I have two things. I understand that the training process can be ongoing and there has been training done in the past and it's still ongoing on the gender-based analysis, as you mentioned in your testimony. In terms of the complaints, I asked this before. Going on with what my colleague was saying, should there be another layer in terms of the complaint process, when some adjudicators have 54% of claims with a designation of no credible grounds and then other adjudicators have 28% to 30% with that designation? I understand the discretion of the adjudicator having the evidence at hand and making that decision, but once that is an ongoing process and that's been going on for years, shouldn't there be a flag saying that between these two adjudicators there's something wrong here?