To be frank, we've had very few instances where a member has actually left. There's the one that was the focus of this committee's study. The issue hadn't come up before. Now that it has come up, the approach, I think, that we would take in relation to that is that there's not a problem from a due process perspective if we say to the person, “Even though you're no longer a member, here's your opportunity to tell us. If you decline that opportunity, we may go ahead and make findings anyway.”
I can't say this is going to happen in every instance, because it may turn on the facts of a particular case that we actually are not in a position to do that. There's that problem, but in many instances I think we would be in a position to do that, which is why it's something that I think is in the board's interest in terms of transparency and accountability to pursue.