What you will see—and I'm working on one instance, which will shortly be up on the board's website—is a set of reasons, which is anonymized, which basically describes the problem: the allegations against the member, the findings that I'll make in relation to that, and the determination as to whether the complaint is founded. The things it won't include are names and the location of the board where it took place so that people can triangulate and figure out who it might be. They will be anonymized. The purpose of doing that is to ensure that the public looking at that can say that it doesn't really matter who it was or where it took place, but this is the allegation and this is how the board responded to it, and they can judge for themselves whether it's satisfactory. It won't be a two-line thing; there will be fairly extensive reasons, which go into detail as to what was alleged and what was determined to be the case.
On April 24th, 2018. See this statement in context.